In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge:
In this consolidated, multi-district litigation (“MDL”), Plaintiffs1 are purchasers and users of a paint product called “Deck *778& Concrete Restore” or “Restore 10X” (collectively “Restore”), manufactured by Defendant Rust-Oleum Corporation (“Rust-Oleum”). Plaintiffs allege that Restore contains latent defects that result in premature degradation upon application. Plaintiffs contend that Rust-Oleum knew that Restore was defective prior to and during its marketing, selling, and warranting the product to Plaintiffs. Before the Court…
2Cases cited212 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Schechner v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Elward v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Traxler v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
- Elward v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.