Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Gen. Motors LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 7, 2018No. Case No. 16–cv–07244–EMCPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs allege that Defendant General Motors (GM) manufactured and sold a car engine that, due to several internal defects, consumes excessive amounts of oil, resulting in engine damage that presents a safety risk of sudden shutdowns or engine fires. GM moves to dismiss on several grounds which can broadly be grouped under challenges to personal jurisdiction for the out-of-state plaintiffs; failure to plead an unreasonable safety hazard or *851pre-sale knowledge that gives rise to a duty to disclose in support of the consumer protection and fraud…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Matanky v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  2. Baranco v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
  4. Campbell v. Freshbev LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  5. Beasley v. Conagra Brands, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API