Legal Opinion
Golden v. Den-Mat Corp.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided May 4, 2012No. 103,952PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atcheson, J.:
Plaintiff Brenda Golden purchased dental veneers — porcelain overlays meant to improve the appearance of teeth — that Defendant Den-Mat manufactured and marketed and Defendant Dr. Carissa M. Gill, a dentist, put in place. Golden contends the veneers became discolored and stained despite representations from Den-Mat and Dr. Gill that they would retain their appearance. So she sued them in Sedgwick County District Court on the grounds the veneers breached implied warranties applicable to goods sold under Article 2 — -Sales of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), K.S.A. 84-2-101 et…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bulova Watch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Hutchinson v. PfeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Bouton v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- Nieberding v. Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
- Dana v. Heartland Management Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
- Estate of Randolph v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.