Legal Opinion

Warren's Kiddie Shoppe, Inc. v. Casual Slacks, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 3, 1969No. 44583, 44584PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The plaintiff contends that parol evidence is inadmissible to explain the shipment term “June-Aug.” because the term unambiguously meant that the goods could be shipped at any time during June and July and through August 31, while defendants contend that whether or not the term “June-Aug.” is ambiguous, evidence of course of dealing and usage of trade is admissible to explain or supplement the written terms of a contract. The Uniform Commercial Code which governs contracts of the kind here involved supports defendant’s contention. “Terms with respect to which the confirmatory…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Jefferson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Jinright v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Nanakuli Paving & Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API