Rugg v. Tolman
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District. Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by H. F. Rugg against D‘. H. Tolman, doing business as Union Credit & Investment Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.
This was an action to recover damages alleged to Have been sustained by respondent on account of having been discharged by his employer by reason of the “willful, wrongful, and malicious” acts of appellant as hereinafter stated.
The material facts, taken from respondent’s statement of the facts, most favorable to him, in substance, are.: That on September 1, 1906, a man signing his name as II. F. Rugg, which is the name, including the initials, of respondent, obtained a loan of $19.80 from appellant, who, it seems, was engaged in the business of lending money to persons employed for wages or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Borland v. BarrettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
- President of Baltimore v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Haswell v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Stark v. BareSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Yerian v. LinkletterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LawrenceUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Wilson v. OldroydUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Calhoun v. Universal Credit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
- Goldsberry v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.