Legal Opinion

Yerian v. Linkletter

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1889No. 12934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

Action for damages alleged to have been caused by the .defendant driving his horse and vehicle, on a street of the city of Los Angeles, in such a negligent, careless, fast, and altogether reckless manner, and without ordinary care and caution, as to run over, knock down, and injure the plaintiff, etc. Judgment was given against the defendant, upon the verdict of a jury, in the sum of eight hundred dollars. From that, and an order refusing a new trial, the defendant appeals.

The court instructed the jury, in writing: “If the jury find, from the testimony, that the plaintiff was injured…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Wootan v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Rugg v. TolmanUtah Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API