Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1951No. 7574PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

This case comes to us on an appeal from a conviction of grand larceny, arising out of the theft of an automobile. Two questions are presented: First, where there is no evidence of value except a description of the property involved, is it prejudicial error for the court to instruct the jury that the value of the property is greater than $50 and that if defendant is guilty at all he is guilty of grand larceny. The necessity of answering the first question in the *326affirmative gives rise to the second: Where such error has been committed, can the cause be remanded for retrial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Utah State Fair Ass'n v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. State v. KesslerUtah Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. William Allen Jones, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. State v. SeymourUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. VejvodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Acadia-Vermilion Rice Irrigating Co. v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API