Legal Opinion

Stark v. Bare

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Fror from Shawnee Superior Court. Action by Bare against Stark, to recover damages for wrongfully preventing plaintiff from obtaining the benefit of the exemption law as to his personal earnings. To the petition the defendant filed a demurrer, which the court overruled at the September term, 1886. To reverse this ruling, defendant brings the case here. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

J. V. Bare brought an action in the superior court of Shawnee county, against N. D. Stark, to recover damages for the wrongful action of Stark in defeating him from obtaining the benefit of the exemption laws of Kansas, and in injuring the credit and standing of Bare with his employers. The allegations of the petition are in substance that the plaintiff and defendant are permanent residents of the city of Topeka, and that Bare is a married man, having a family depending upon him for support, and is engaged in the service of the Atchison,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. FrankeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Vail v. KnappNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Haswell v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Albrecht v. TreitschkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CanadaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Vanover v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. McMahonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Owens v. DeutchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Kestler v. KernIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API