Legal Opinion

Crookston v. Fire Insurance Exchange

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1991No. 880034PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Fire Insurance Exchange (“Fire Insurance”) appeals a jury verdict awarding Spencer Larry Crookston and Randi Lynn Crookston (collectively referred to as “the Crookstons”) and Anna W. Drake, trustee of the Crookstons’ estate, compensatory damages of $815,826 and punitive damages of $4,000,000 on various theories arising out of Fire Insurance’s failure to pay in full a claim for property damage caused by the collapse of the Crookstons’ home while under construction. Fire Insurance also appeals the trial court’s award of $175,000 in attorney fees and $11,126 in costs to the…

2Cases cited108 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Armed Forces Insurance Exchange v. HarrisonUtah Supreme Court · 2003

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API