Legal Opinion
Minnesota Agricultural Aircraft Ass'n v. Township of Mantrap
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 30, 1993No. C6-92-2289PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
A township appeals from summary judgment and an injunction prohibiting enforcement of its ordinance regulating the aerial spraying of chemicals and pesticides. We affirm the district court’s determination that the ordinance is preempted by Minn. Stat. § 18B.02 (1990).
FACTS
In May 1992 the Township of Mantrap adopted a pesticide ordinance entitled “Ordinance to Regulate Aerial Spraying, Article 4, Sect. 9, An Ordinance to Require a Permit for the Application of Aerially Applied Pesticides and/or Chemicals.” The ordinance requires a permit at least sixty days before the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- City of Minnetonka v. Mark Z. Jones Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Northwest Residence, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Board of Supervisors v. ValAdCoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Montgomery Cnty. v. Complete Lawn Care, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Law v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Montgomery Cnty. v. Complete Lawn CareCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019