Legal Opinion
City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 2007No. A06-1188PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
In this temporary injunction action, appellant Michael Sax 1 challenges the dis trict court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent City of Morris, arguing that the court erred by concluding that the Minnesota State Building Code, Minn.Stat. §§ 16B.59-.76 (2004) did not preempt the city’s rental housing code, found at Morris City Code, Section 4.32 (1997).
Because we conclude that the state building code preempts matters of construction, remodeling, restoration, or alteration in residential housing, but does not preempt local authorities from creating and enforcing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- City of Minnetonka v. Mark Z. Jones Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Minnesota Agricultural Aircraft Ass'n v. Township of MantrapCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Canadian Connection v. New Prairie TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008