City of Minnetonka v. Mark Z. Jones Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
These proceedings have been brought by the city of Min-netonka to require appellant Mark Z. Jones Associates, Inc., to comply with provisions of the city’s Fire Prevention Code in the construction of an apartment building in that municipality. Jones appealed to the commissioner of administration who held that the city was without authority to enforce the code because it had been superseded by the State Building Code. On appeal to the district court by Minnetonka, the decision of the commissioner was reversed. The court held that the State Building Code does not preempt, conflict…
2Cited by13 opinions
- City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Builders Ass'n v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Bicking v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Board of Supervisors v. ValAdCoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Minnesota Agricultural Aircraft Ass'n v. Township of MantrapCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.