Legal Opinion
Board of Supervisors v. ValAdCo
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 10, 1993No. C5-93-155PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge.
A township appeals from summary judgment prohibiting enforcement of its ordinance regulating pollution from animal feedlots. We affirm the district court’s decision that the ordinance is preempted by and in conflict with Minn.Stat. § 116.07, subd. 7 (1992).
FACTS
ValAdCo, a cooperative of thirty-eight farm families, sought state and county approval to build two hog confinement facilities on land zoned for agricultural uses in Crooks Township. The Renville County Board of Commissioners approved permits for both sites.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- City of Minnetonka v. Mark Z. Jones Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Northern States Power Co. v. City of Granite FallsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Minnesota Agricultural Aircraft Ass'n v. Township of MantrapCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Goodell v. Humboldt CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Welsh v. Centerville TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Blue Earth County Pork Producers, Inc. v. County of Blue EarthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Altenburg v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Canadian Connection v. New Prairie TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.