Legal Opinion

SE Rondon Company v. Atlantic Richfield Company

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 25, 1968No. Civ. 68-11-IHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Embodied Herein)

IRVING HILL, District Judge.

The motion of Defendant for'partial summary judgment under Civil Rule 56(d), filed March 28, 1968, came before the Court for hearing on May 13, 1968, and counsel for both sides appeared at that time. The Court having heard oral argument and having considered the said motion together with the points and authorities, affidavits and other documents filed in support thereof and in opposition thereto, and having also considered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Taxin v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. Carter v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  4. California Concrete Pipe Co. v. American Pipe & Construction Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Redel's Inc. v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Dobbins v. Kawasaki Motors Corporation, USADistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1973
  3. Mulhern v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
  4. Rick Michaels Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. (In Re Rick Michaels Ford, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  5. Freedlander v. NCNB Nat. Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API