Legal Opinion
Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, Limited
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1950No. 12158PublishedCited by 180 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONE, Circuit Judge.
This action was commenced by the four appellants 1 on September 11, 1947. It is a suit for treble damages brought under the antitrust laws of the United States, 15 U.S.C.A. § IS, involves the borax industry, and is based on the claim that appellees 2 conspired together and drove appellants out of business by wrongful and illegal acts, all of which damaged appellants in the sum of $5,000,000. The prayer of the complaint is for a recovery of three times this, amount. The case is here on appeal from the order of the trial court dismissing appellants’ second amended complaint…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Bluefields S. S. Co. v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by180 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Armstrong v. McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.