Legal Opinion

Mulhern v. Rogers

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 30, 1986No. 84-6975 CivPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

SCOTT, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Kenny Rogers, popular singer and well-known motion picture “Gambler”, wagers that this Court will summarily end this litigation by Rule 56 motion. While the cards have dealt the litigants many potential legal issues, 1 Defendant Rogers argues that his true “ace in the hole” is a general release executed during earlier litigation. In other words, Rogers asserts that Plaintiff R. Joseph Mulhern has already played his hand and thus may not reshuffle to start anew.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Mulhern filed an original Federal complaint against Defendant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Bernard McKeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Hurt v. Leatherby Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. Burger King Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
  2. Plumpton v. CONTINNENTAL ACREAGE DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Brewer v. Laborfinders of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Mulholland v. USAA Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Beck-Ford Construction, LLC v. TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LPDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API