Legal Opinion
California Concrete Pipe Co. v. American Pipe & Construction Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 31, 1968No. Civ. No. 65-674-MPPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PENCE, District Judge.
Plaintiff California Concrete Pipe Co. (CCP) has sued under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (Title 15 U.S.C. § 15) for treble the damage allegedly suffered as a result of defendants’ violations of the antitrust laws.
Between October 1962 and December 31, 1963, plaintiff was in the business of manufacturing and selling concrete conduit pipe at its plant in the City of Industry, California. On December 31, 1963 plaintiff severally sold virtually all of its manufacturing equipment to defendants herein. The sales…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Radio Corp. of America v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Taxin v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Raytheon Mfg. Co. v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Carter v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Redel's Inc. v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- SE Rondon Company v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968
- VKK Corp. v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Locklin v. Day-Glo Color CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970