Legal Opinion
Dobbins v. Kawasaki Motors Corporation, USA
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 15, 1973No. Civ. 71-105PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SKOPIL, District Judge:
Defendant Kawasaki Motors Corporation, U.S.A. (KMC) has moved under Rule 56 for partial summary judgment. Plaintiffs have also moved for partial summary judgment against KMC. Defendant Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI), a Japanese corporation, has moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and (3) to dismiss this action as to it for lack of jurisdiction and improper venue.
Summary judgment is, of course, only available where no genuine issue of material fact remains and the. movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Industrial Bldg. Materials, Inc. v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ingram Corp. v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Grappone, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1975
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- VKK Corp. v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.