Legal Opinion

Sutter v. Madrin

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1969No. Civ. 32264PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.

This appeal is on the judgment roll from a portion of the judgment denying restitution of $20,000 paid on account of the purchase price by appellants Buyers to respondent Seller in connection with an abortive sale of real property. On July 31, 1962, Mr. and Mrs. Sutter, appellants, entered into an escrow agreement to purchase the Oaks Hotel in Ojai, for the sum of $412,500 from respondent Madrin. The trial court found that Mr. Elliot, a real estate broker, acted in behalf of appellants, and Mr. Nalley acted as real estate broker in behalf of respondent, Madrin. Mr. Elliot led appellants to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Andrews v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Abrams v. MotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Baron v. BaronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Osborne v. Cal-Am Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Zareas v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Askari v. R & R LAND CO.California Court of Appeal · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API