Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Motter

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1970No. Civ. 32245PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REPPY, J.

In a nonjury trial of an action brought by plaintiff and respondent Abrams as intended seller of a luxury residence, fully furnished, located on Angelo Drive in the City of Los Angeles (hereinafter “Angelo residence’’), for breach of contract by defendant and appellant Motter as intended buyer, the trial court, on April 27, 1967, rendered judgment in favor of Abrams for his loss of bargain damages, for interest on the full purchase price (less existing encumbrance) from date of breach to date of resale, for interest on the loss of bargain damages from date of resale to date of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Kudokas v. BalkusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Osborne v. Cal-Am Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API