Legal Opinion

Royer v. Carter

California Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1951No. L. A. 21857PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment for damages for breach of a contract to purchase real property. On August 23, 1948, defendant agreed to buy plaintiff’s house and lot for $24,000 and paid $1,000 down. Because she was unable to secure the additional funds necessary to complete the purchase, defendant defaulted on the contract, and plaintiff put the property back on the market late in September. The following December plaintiff was able to . resell the property for $18,500. The trial court awarded damages equal to the difference between the contract price and the price at which the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Huth v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API