Askari v. R & R LAND CO.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
Plaintiff and cross-defendant Mansour Askari appeals a judgment of damages against him for breach of contract to purchase real property, raising issues of contract interpretation and allowance of damages under the Civil Code. Defendant and cross-complainant R & R Land Company (R & R) also appeals the amount of damages the trial court awarded.
*
We reverse the judgment and remand for factual determinations regarding consequential damages. The trial judge must determine the following: (1) Whether the consequential damages were reasonably foreseeable at the time of contracting;…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Earp v. NobmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Honey v. Henry's Franchise Leasing Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Abrams v. MotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Westfield Development Co. v. Rifle Investment AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- HAVILAH REAL PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC v. VLK, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Haisfield v. ACP Florida Holdings, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Fcd Development, LLC v. South Florida Sports Committee, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Peabey Associates v. Haisfield (In Re Haisfield Enterprises)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.