Legal Opinion
State v. Addai
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 2010No. 20090079PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Elijah Addai appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of murder. We conclude the district court did not err in denying Ad-dai’s motion to suppress evidence of the stop, the eyewitness identification procedure used in this case was not unnecessarily suggestive and the identification was reliable, the court did not abuse its discretion by denying Addai’s motion to dismiss for discovery violations, and competent evidence supports the jury’s verdict. We affirm the judgment.
I
[¶ 2] In the early morning hours of Sunday, August 19, 2007, a group…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Craig William BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Peyronel, Bobby JoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. FelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. VondalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Mandan v. Strata Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.