Legal Opinion

State v. Ostby

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2014No. 20130411PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Arthur Bruce Lanakila Ostby, Jr., appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. We conclude the district court did not err in denying Ostby’s suppression motion, Ostby’s due process rights were not violated by the State’s failure to preserve evidence, and the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On October 13, 2010, Fargo law enforcement officers conducted a controlled drug buy in which they had a confidential…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Zimmerman v. North Dakota Department of Transportation DirectorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrossartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. OwensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. BornsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. KolstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. SargentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API