Legal Opinion
Hall v. E. W. Wells & Son
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 1914No. Civ. No. 1185PublishedCited by 16 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of. Humboldt County and from an order refusing a new trial. Clifton H: Conniek, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action on a promissory note of which the following is a copy:
“P. 0. Eureka, State of Calif., Aug. 3, 1911. For value received we promise to pay to the order of American Manufacturing Company, fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500) at Chicago, 111., in installments payable as follows: One month after date $150.00; (then follow nine other installments of $150.00 each, payable in 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 months after date respectively.) Default in the payment of any installment shall at the option of the payee herein, render the unpaid balance immediately due and payable.
“(Signed) E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davidson v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Brown v. RouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hosea v. RowleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- King v. LagrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Hart v. StickneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Moreno v. Los Angeles Transfer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Palo Alto Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Toth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Collins v. HodgsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.