Watkins v. Clemmer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This, the first of these appeals, is taken upon the judgment-roll. The appellant sued the respondent upon an account stated for $1500, based upon surgical services rendered to respondent’s minor son. The court held that the statement of an account had not been established, and found, among other facts, the following: In 1920 the respondent and Bernice Clemmer were divorced; the custody of their son, John, was awarded to Mrs. Clemmer and the respondent was ordered to pay $20 a month for the boy’s support, and later $35, which he has since paid. Mrs. Clemmer remarried and is now Mrs.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Schultz v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Dixon v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rosher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Burge v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Horr v. CattaliniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Weingart v. KiessenbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Fagan v. FaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.