Toth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSON, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff upon an alleged parol contract of insurance.
The trial court included among its findings of fact certain findings, the substance of which is as follows: That on May 14, 1930, Andrew Toth and defendant, the said defendant acting through and by its agent and representative thereunto fully empowered and authorized by the defendant, entered into a certain oral contract whereby the defendant for a valuable consideration then and there paid to defendant by said Toth did insure and agree to insure the life of said Toth for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Sharman v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Linnastruth v. Mut. Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- K. C. Working Chemical Co. v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Guipre v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Dias v. Nationwide Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Norton v. Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.