Schomaker v. Petersen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J., pro tem.
This is an action based on a promissory note executed to the plaintiff by the defendants J. B. Petersen and S. Matthesen, together with their respective wives, and at all times after its delivery kept by plaintiff in her own exclusive possession.
The question presented on this appeal by plaintiff concerns itself with the authority of a real estate agent, who had negotiated the transaction giving rise to the note, to bind the payee by receipt of a payment procured on such agent’s own solicitation, and misappropriated by him.
The plaintiff, Mrs. Schomaker, acting through E.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith v. . KiddNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Wynn v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wynn v. . GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Ballard v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc. v. Spitters (In Re Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Maloney v. Rhode Island InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Gates v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Jones v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Olsen v. SundlingMontana Supreme Court · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.