Legal Opinion
Kalas v. Cook
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 18, 2002No. AC 21439PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
Pursuant to a long-standing oral agreement, a print shop manufactured and delivered written materials designed by the buyer for the buyer’s use and sale. After the buyer’s death, the executor of her estate refused to pay for the last deliveries of these materials to the buyer. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the statute of frauds, as codified in the Uniform Commercial Code, General Statutes § 42a-l-101 et seq., bars enforcement of the oral agreement. Although our conclusion rests on statutory grounds that were not cited to the trial court, we agree with the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Impossible Electronics Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Torringford Farms Ass'n v. City of TorringtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Western Dermatology Consultants, P.C. v. VitalWorks, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Parker v. SlosbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.