Legal Opinion
New London Federal Savings Bank v. Tucciarone
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 17, 1998No. AC 16262; AC 16263PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
These appeals are from the judgments rendered following defendants’ verdicts after a jury trial. These consolidated appeals, which are identical, involve cases consolidated in the trial court.1 We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
On appeal, the plaintiffs, numerous tenants of commercial real estate and their respective insurance carriers, raise several claims, but only two of the claims are *91reviewable: (1) that the trial court improperly allowed an expert witness for the defendant owners’ to testify beyond the scope of direct examination and to render an opinion not…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Webel v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-StrattonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Martel v. Metropolitan District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Danuael D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Altfeter v. Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.