Legal Opinion
Wilson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 4, 2004No. 2-03-490-CRPublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.
In four issues, Appellant Adrian Thaddeus Wilson appeals his aggravated robbery conviction, claiming that 1) the trial court erred in allowing hearsay testimony, 2) allowing the hearsay testimony was reversible error, 3) his constitutional right to confrontation was violated, and 4) such violation constitutes reversible error. We affirm.
Factual Background
On March 23, 2003, Aron and Kristyle Webb returned home from a Mend’s birthday party. At 1:30 a.m., Fort Worth Police received a dispatch to the Webbs’ home concerning a robbery. Aron told police that a car…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Moreno Denoso v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Spencer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.