Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided January 10, 2007No. 03-05-00345-CRPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.

A jury found appellant Leonardo Martinez guilty of the offenses of aggravated sexual assault of a child, indecency with a child by contact, and indecency with a child by exposure. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. §§ 21.11 (indecency with a child), 22.021(a)(1)(B) (aggravated sexual assault of a child) (West 2003 & Supp.2005). Martinez argues that the court’s charge permitted the jury to convict him of each offense with less than a unanimous verdict and that this error requires reversal. Martinez also asserts that his right against double jeopardy was violated and that the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Gonzalez Soto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  2. Cueva v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
  3. Jourdan, RicardoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. De Los Santos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  5. Ruiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API