Legal Opinion

Spencer v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided April 28, 2005No. 14-04-00059-CRPublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice.

Appellant Randall Bruce Spencer appeals from his conviction for the domestic assault of Michelle O’Mealey. O’Mealey did not testify at trial, but the trial court allowed two peace officers who responded to the scene after O’Mealey called 911 to testify that O’Mealey told them appellant had hit her. Appellant contends this ruling deprived him of his right to confront witnesses against him under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Because we conclude that O’Mealey’s statements to the officers were not “testimonial,” we affirm.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Ruth v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Cook v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API