Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Village of Marblehead

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1999No. 98-1061PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

Although Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution grants municipalities the exclusive authority to provide their residents with utility services, a statute that limits the municipality’s power is not unconstitutional if the purpose of the statute is an exercise of the state’s police powers and is not a substantial *45infringement upon the municipality’s authority. Because R.C. 6103.04 satisfies these requirements, it is not unconstitutional.

The Ohio Constitution authorizes a municipality to provide water service to its residents to the exclusion of other providers. See Lucas v. Lucas Local School…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. Renalist, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Columbus v. TeaterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Village of Lucas v. Lucas Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Reading v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. TaftDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  3. In Re GoodmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Village of Grafton Kng, Ltd. v. Rural Lorain County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. City of North Olmsted v. North Olmsted Land Holdings, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API