Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Teater

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1978No. 77-540PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

R. C. 1501.17 provides:

“No state department, agency, or political subdivision may build or enlarge any highway, road, or structure or modify or cause to modify the channel of any watercourse within a wild, scenic, or recreational river area outside the limits of a municipal corporation without having first obtained approval of the plans for such highway, road, or structure or channel modification from the director of natural resources. The common pleas court having jurisdiction shall, upon petition by the director, enjoin work on any highway, road, or structure or channel modification for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sligh v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Arey v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Toledo Edison Co. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Reading v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Kettering v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API