Legal Opinion
Village of Grafton Kng, Ltd. v. Rural Lorain County Water Authority
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2005No. 04-3643PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
The Village of Grafton (“Village” or “Grafton”) and KNG, Ltd. appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Rural Lorain County Water Authority (“RLCWA”) regarding RLCWA’s right to provide water services to Fox Run Subdivision (“Fox Run”), a recently developed property that was annexed by the Village in 1990. For the reasons discussed hereafter, we AFFIRM.
BACKGROUND
RLCWA was formed in 1974 to provide water and/or sewer service to rural areas in Ohio, pursuant to Ohio Revised Code § 6119.01 et seq. Fourteen townships and two villages filed a petition to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Lexington-South Elkhorn Water District v. City of Wilmore, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Adams County Regional Water District and Adams County Water Company, Inc. v. Village of Manchester, Ohio and Village of West Union, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Le-Ax Water District v. City of Athens, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Board of County Commissioners v. Village of MarbleheadOhio Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ross County Water Company, Inc v. City of ChillicotheCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- City of Cowan v. City of WinchesterDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Dyersburg Suburban Consolidated Utility District v. The City of DyersburgCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- Milcrofton Utility District of Williamson County, Tennessee v. City of Brentwood, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Wesley Finch v. O.B. Hofstetter/Anderson TrustCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017