Legal Opinion
Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. Taft
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 22, 2000No. C-3-00-368PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (DOC. # 2); DEFENDANTS, THEIR EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, SERVANTS PRELIMINARILY ENJOINED FROM ENFORCING ANY PROVISION OF SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 351, PENDING FINAL DECISION ON MERITS; CONFERENCE CALL SET FOR THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2000, AT 5:00 P.M., TO DETERMINE FURTHER PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED IN THIS LITIGATION
RICE, Chief Judge.
On December 13, 1995, in an opinion preliminarily enjoining a prior attempt by the State of Ohio to prohibit a means of pregnancy termination known as Dilation and Extraction or “partial birth”…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Women's Medical Professional Corporation Martin Haskell, Md v. Bob Taft, Governor Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General Mathias H. Heck, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- WomanCare of Southfield, P.C. v. GranholmDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. TaftDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. TaftDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Stinson v. Montgomery Cnty. Bd. of Educ.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.