Legal Opinion
City of Reading v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 2006No. 2005-0245PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Background
{¶ 1} This is an appeal as of right by appellant, the city of Reading, from an order of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio in In the Matter of the Petition of Indiana & Ohio Railroad, Inc. to Close to Vehicular Traffic the Vorhees Street Crossing in the City of Reading, Hamilton County, Ohio, case No. 02-589-RR-UNC, 2003 WL 23415030 (Oct. 13, 2004). The Indiana & Ohio Railroad, Inc. was the petitioner, and Reading was an intervening party at the commission. The railroad has intervened as an appellee. The Ohio Municipal League has filed an amicus brief in support of Reading, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Wymsylo v. Bartec, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Kalniz v. Ohio State Dental BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Kingsley v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.