Legal Opinion

City of North Olmsted v. North Olmsted Land Holdings, Ltd.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 2000No. 74877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia Ann Blackmon, Judge.

Appellant city of North Olmsted appeals a decision by the trial court in favor of appellee North Olmsted Land Holdings, Ltd. in its complaint for violation of the city’s Urban Forest Ordinance. North Olmsted assigns the following three errors for our review:

“I. The trial court erred in granting defendant-appellee’s motion to dismiss, where the court failed to make any effort to decide the motion on the non-constitutional issues raised by defendant-appellee, and then decided the motion by holding that a provision of Section 950.03 of the North Olmsted Urban Forest…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Department of Commerce v. United States House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haight v. Cheap Escape Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Akron v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API