Legal Opinion

Northern States Power Co. v. Barnard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1932No. 29,029PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Appellant appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

Appellant instituted condemnation proceedings for easements over certain lands for transmission line purposes. Plaintiff owned a 200-acre farm having buildings valued at $12,000. It is located upon the bluff of the Minnesota river valley and has some first-class land on the highland where the buildings are located and some stony and timber land on the bluffs and on the lowland. It is a good average Minnesota farm. In the proceedings appellant acquired a diagonal right of way over this farm, 2,950 feet in length. It involved…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Buenemann v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Peterson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Thurston v. MartinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1830
  5. Quinn v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. HamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. MacIllravie v. St. Barnabas HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Romano v. DibbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API