Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1896No. Nos. 9998-(108)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Brown county, Webber, J., denying a motion for a new trial. The words were not libelous per se. If they had a peculiar mean- , ing at New Ulm, it is immaterial, since such meaning was not known . to the operator there or to the operator at the other end of the line.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Brown county, Webber, J., denying a motion for a new trial. The words were not libelous per se. If they had a peculiar mean- , ing at New Ulm, it is immaterial, since such meaning was not known . to the operator there or to the operator at the other end of the line. Hankinson v. Bilby, 16 M. & W. 442; Shull v. Raymond, 23 Minn. 66. Even if in sending the telegram the New Ulm operator, though not legally excusable, was acting under a mistaken sense ■of duty, this is a case “at most for only compensatory and not for vindictive…

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This is an action for libel, in which the plaintiff recovered a verdict for $5,200, and the defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The defendant on January 19, 1893, received at its office in New Ulm, from Albert Blanchard, a message for transmission over its telegraph line to St. Paul, which read thus: “New Ulm, Minn. 1-19, 1893. To S. D. Peterson, Care Windsor, St. Paul, Minn.: Slippery Sam, your name is pants. [Signed] Many Republicans.” The New Ulm operator. sent the message over the wires to St. Paul, where it was taken from the wire by the operator, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilkes v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Morse v. Times-Republican Printing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Arnold v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Shields v. BoolesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Flowers v. CarvilleDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API