Quinn v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff obtained a verdict for $21,000, consented to a reduction of $5,000, and defend ant has appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The sole question is whether the verdict as reduced is so excessive as to require a new trial unless plaintiff consents to a further reduction.
At the time of his injury, plaintiff was a switchman, 39 years old and earning $175 a month. While endeavoring to adjust a defective lock block in the coupler of a freight car, his left arm was caught between the couplers and badly crushed. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ott v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Gibson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Howard v. Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Behrendt v. Times Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.