State v. Hamer
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
— This is an action to condemn 1.4 acres of land for state highway purposes. The land taken was from an eight acre tract. In the regular proceedings, appraisers were appointed who filed their report assessing damages in the sum of $2,200. Exceptions were filed, a trial had by a jury, and a verdict for $7,500 was returned, and judgment was rendered for $8,367.50, including interest.
Appellant relies upon two errors for reversal: First— In overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial; and, second, in overruling appellant’s motion to modify the judgment.
We will consider the errors complained of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Schnull v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
- School District v. Phoenix Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- City of St. Louis v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Van Sickle v. Kokomo Water Works Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Harper v. GoodinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. VAUGHAN ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Buuck v. KruckebergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. TreasMississippi Supreme Court · 1945
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.