Legal Opinion

Marich v. Bob Bennett Construction Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2008No. 2006-1827PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

I

{¶ 1} This appeal presents two issues for our review: (1) whether R.C. 5577.05 and 4513.34 take precedence over City of Norton Codified Ordinances 440.01 and (2) if so, whether a party who complied with the ordinance but not with the statutes is negligent per se for a resulting injury. For the following reasons, we hold that the statutes take precedence over the ordinance and that a holding of negligence per se is inappropriate in this case.

*554II

{¶ 2} On November 8, 2002, appellant John Goss was driving a tractor-trailer on Clark Mill Road in Norton, Ohio, as part of his employment with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sikora v. WenzelOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Brown v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. City of Cleveland v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re Complaint of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API