Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Bates

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2006No. 2005-0998PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, accepted on a discretionary appeal, we conclude that the collateral-source rule does not apply to bar evidence of the amount accepted by a medical care provider from an insurer as full payment for medical or hospital treatment. Both the amount originally billed by the provider and the amount paid by the insurer are admissible to prove the reasonable value of the medical treatment.

{¶ 2} On the evening of April 21, 2001, the appellee, Carolyn Robinson, broke a bone in her foot when she fell in the driveway of the residence she rented from the appellant, Helen Gist Bates,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Chambers v. St. Mary's SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bozeman v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. May v. Tandy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Aaron Glenn Haygood v. Margarita Garza De EscabedoTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Howell v. HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC.California Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Wills v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Stanley v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2009

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API