Legal Opinion
Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. City of Clyde
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 2008No. 2007-0960PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} The issue presented in this case concerns whether Clyde City Ordinance No. 2004-41, which prohibits licensed handgun owners from carrying concealed handguns in Clyde city parks, is a valid exercise of the municipality’s home-rule power according to Section 3, Article XVIII, of the Ohio Constitution. Because the ordinance is an exercise of the municipality’s police power that conflicts with a general law, the ordinance is unconstitutional. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
H.B. 12
{¶ 2} In January 2004, the General Assembly enacted Am.Sub.H.B. No. 12. Effective…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. SlancoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Cleveland v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Shawn Northrup v. City of Toledo Police Dep'tCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. Columbus (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Gesler v. City of Worthington Income Tax Board of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.