Legal Opinion
In re Complaint of Reynoldsburg
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 2012No. 2011-1274PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
Summary
{¶ 1} The city of Reynoldsburg is a municipal corporation governed by a charter. Intervening appellee, Columbus Southern Power Company (“CSP”), is a public utility under R.C. 4905.02 and provides electric power to Reynoldsburg and its residents.
{¶ 2} The issue in this case is whether Reynoldsburg or CSP bears the cost to relocate overhead power lines underground. Specifically, Reynoldsburg seeks a ruling that its right-of-way ordinance requiring all overhead power lines to be relocated underground takes precedence over CSP’s commission-approved tariff in this particular aspect.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- TWISM Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & SurveyorsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Cleveland v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- In re Complaints of Lycourt-Donovan v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- In re Application of Alamo Solar I, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- In re Complaint of Buckeye Energy Brokers v. Palmer Energy Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.