Sikora v. Wenzel
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
With this decision we confirm that the doctrine of negligence per se countenances lack of notice of a defective condition as a legal excuse. We reverse the appellate court’s determination that notice is irrelevant and strict liability applies, and instead hold that a violation of R.C. 5321.04(A)(1) (failing to comply with the Ohio Basic Building Code) constitutes negligence per se, but that such liability may be excused by a landlord’s lack of actual or constructive notice of the defective condition.
In Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc., supra, this court set forth the broad principle that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. R.E. Roark Companies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Chambers v. St. Mary's SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Robinson v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Mann v. Northgate Investors, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Marich v. Bob Bennett Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.