Williams v. Hawley
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Campbell, Metson & Campbell, and William D. Dehy, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial. "The action is to enforce an alleged lien upon a mining claim belonging to the defendant, for services as a watchman, alleged to have been performed by the plaintiff for the defendant, amounting to the sum of six hundred and thirty-seven dollars.
The defendant attempts to raise the point that a person engaged as a watchman of a mine is not performing “labor in any mining claim” so as to be entitled to a lien under section 1183 of the Code of Civil Procedure, although the work of mining therein or development…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wright v. RoseberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Janson v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Reese v. Bald Mountain Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Parsons v. EastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Tanzola v. De RitaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Stern v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.