Legal Opinion

Self-Service Sales Corp. v. Heinz

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 3, 1983No. (2334)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

This case raises the narrow issue of whether, after the granting of a prejudgment remedy ex parte, the court, at the hearing on the motion to dissolve the attachment, must determine the question solely on the basis of the sufficiency of probable cause in the supporting affidavit or on the basis of the affidavit and all of the evidence adduced at the hearing.

The plaintiff, Self-Service Sales Corporation, and the defendants Curtiss H. Heinz and Ellen A. Heinz allegedly entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to supply amusement devices and cigarette vending machines to the Heinzes’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. Williams v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. New England Whalers Hockey Club v. NairConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  2. Cavallo v. LewisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Goodwin v. PrattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. Glanz v. TestaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Sweet v. Sumnerbrook Mill Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API